Translated from the print edition of L’Équipe by Mark Nixon, May 27, 2018, pages 30-31. Rafael Nadal was interview by Vincent Cognet.
Relaxed during his Roman week, the Spaniard plays the question game, which comes from all angles, some anecdotal, some serious, about him, his life as a champion and his attitude towards tennis.
Rome ten days ago. Rafael Nadal leaves victorious his match against Fabio Fognini. After the presser and food, he plays a game of Parchis (a Spanish board game), then decides to do the interview in the garden annexed to the players’ room. In a comfortable mood, Nadal will nevertheless answer with priceless seriousness.
From the beginning, what made you happiest about tennis?
The competition. In tennis, it’s very intense because it’s every day. and it’s face-to-face. I always loved competition whether it’s sports or games.
So it’s nothing to do with the racquet or the balls?
[Smiles] Seriously, I don’t remember that well.
Many players mention the importance of feeling with a racquet in hand. How do you experience it?
I’m like any other player. I found a simple solution: you need to be positive and play with the right attitude, even when the feeling isn’t there. What’s important is to forget the frustration and accept the situation.
As a kid, did you play pretending to be someone else?
[Firmly] No. I loved training, I loved spending hours and hours at the club. When I was a kid, I could spend entire days at the club playing tennis or something else.
Did you learn watching others?
Of course. In life, it’s easier to copy than invent. I observe others and try and understand what they do well. It’s not possible to give a specific example because it’s not about copying someone. It’s more seizing the idea the player has in his head and adapting it to your own style. It’s more about positioning, ways of moving and placement in relation to the ball. I’ve watched hundreds or thousands of videos of other players on You Tube to try and seize ideas.
Even the black and white ones of old players?
Yes, but not for that. If I want to see something specific, I choose present day players.
Who were your idols when you were a kid?
[Thinks] Tough to say. I grew up with Sampras and Agassi. Later, I was close to Carlos Moya [his coach].
Were you for Sampras or for Agassi?
Neither of them. I liked the rivalry.
Does the history of the game interest you?
Of course. It’s very important. It’s the old players who created the values of this game.
Can you watch a match just as a spectator?
Yes. But we know each other so well as players that we understand very quickly what’s happening on the court. Even if we’re not doing a real analysis, it’s impossible to watch a match as an ordinary spectator.
Do you glance at others’ practices?
[Amused] No. Never.
Because you find it boring …
No. When I’ve finished my time I need to do my recovery, my treatments etc. I’m not saying I don’t glance at the court next to me, but never more than five minutes.
Do you watch tennis sometimes late into the night?
Normally, no. Unless there’s a very special reason. Sometimes I’ll watch golf and that can finish sometimes past midnight.
It’s never bothered you the next day?
No! I can sleep five or six hours if I have nothing special on the next day. It’s not the same as going out and drinking a few. If you only sleep five hours after that, it’s not enough. But if I’m watching the TV, relaxing on my sofa, no problem. If I’m there, it’s because I appreciate what I’m doing. So it’s OK.
Do you agree with the commentators when you watch tennis on TV?
[Exhales] Not always. I know it’s a difficult job. I know they have to commentate quite a few matches during a day. It doesn’t shock me if they wander a bit during the match. Honestly, there are some matches that aren’t fascinating. [Amused] But it’s true I don’t always agree with what’s said about the match! What annoys me the most is when spectators show a lack of respect for the players. But that’s it.
Do you understand the existing debate about tennis’ format and the needs of TV?
It’s very complicated. The ideal solution will never exist. But I think it’s important to respect the history of this sport. And to know it very well. It’s tradition that helps our sport to become even bigger. Besides that, I realise that there must be innovation. What could be done is try the innovations at small tournaments. But don’t touch the big tournaments. There can’t be changes that are too drastic. Move forward in small steps. We can’t get rid of five set matches at Slams. They’re what create the dramas and the most exciting matches. Even if they’re not perfect for the TV, they’re terrific for the spectators. All the emotions, all the passion, come from those matches. If we touch them, tennis will lose a lot. The most important matches in tennis history have been played in five sets.
Are you interested in statistics or records?
Yes, but not crazily. Sure, I know that our generation have broken a lot of records, and that makes me happy.
Are you a stats nut?
Not really. I like checking some things, but … Carlos [Moya], on the other hand, loves them and it’s interesting talking with him after my matches. They can help some things, like court positioning etc. But I’m not going to lose my day reading numbers.
Do you know any stats about you that are less well known to the general public?
Absolutely not. When I beat a record, it’s often you, the journalists, who tell me. The best example is my fifty straight sets won on clay. I only found out about it during it.
Beating records helps motivation?
[Hesitates] It depends. But my real motivation is going out on court every day and playing in the biggest stadiums in the world in front of thousands of spectators. Playing in a stadium filled to bursting with passionate spectators, that’s really a very special feeling.
When we think deeply about it, twelve years between your first major and the last, isn’t that a bigger thing than the sixteen titles?
I’m very proud of my longevity. [A bit mockingly]. Especially because they didn’t stop telling me during my career that I wouldn’t last long as a player because of my playing style. I ended up believing it! I’m very happy to still be competitive at 32. Because it says a lot. It means showing that you can keep the same mentality and the same passion for a very long time.
Would you have been able to share your life with a woman who knew nothing about tennis?
My partner loves tennis. She loved it before we met. But I could very well have lived with a woman who knew nothing about tennis [laughs]. I haven’t tried, but there wouldn’t be a problem. My partner and I talk very little about tennis.
Do you sometimes talk tennis with people who know nothing about it?
[Amused] I can. If they don’t pretend to know, no problem. If the opposite’s the case, I let them talk!
What would you change in the way the tour operates?
I favour a two year ranking and not fifty-two weeks. It’s the best way to protect players in case of injury. I’ve thought that for years, but it’s even more important at the end of a career.
Are you for or against cutting out one of the serves?
Why not? We can’t say it’s stupid. We can only try it out. I’m in favour of innovations. Why not try it at small tournaments? I don’t know … But we could at least consider it.
Do you sometimes play tennis on the Play Station?
Never. Even when I was a kid. I play football on the Play Station. Tennis, I play that all day.
In your opinion, what players have contributed the most to the game?
I can’t answer that question. To answer it, I’d have to have lived in the different eras. It’s an interesting question, but you’d have to ask someone who knows the 1960’s or 1970’s. I know who Rod Laver, Björn Borg or John McEnroe are. But I can’t judge their importance because I wasn’t there.
When you watch old videos on You Tube, who is your favourite player?
Tough to say. I like Ilie Nastase. But I like the tennis of that era because power is less important. There’s more magic. Talent counts for more, tactics too. There was more point construction. That’s what I miss in the tennis of today. Clay is the last surface where you can still construct points. You can still try things. On hard, it’s become almost impossible. It’s too fast.
Source: Tennis Translations